Join WhatsApp Channel for live updates (Unlike WhatsApp Group complete secrecy is maintained here as the Admin also does not know who followed or unfollowed channel)
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7G95i23n3fHykK2K3p
Join WhatsApp Channel for live updates (Unlike WhatsApp Group complete secrecy is maintained here as the Admin also does not know who followed or unfollowed channel)
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7G95i23n3fHykK2K3p
I started Deccan Selections back in 2008
For someone doing this purely out of passion, that kind of response was deeply satisfying.
Encouraged by the success, I expanded beyond Hyderabad and began covering other racing centers as well. The results remained encouraging, and over time I developed a far more structured approach to handicapping.
This eventually led me to create something I was extremely proud of — a Worksheet, a comprehensive data sheet that covered nearly every important handicapping factor:
At that point, I made a decision that many content creators eventually consider—I moved from free content to a paid subscription model.
Initially, the response was decent. Quite a few subscribers signed up because they recognized the amount of effort and expertise involved in producing quality race analysis.
But slowly, things changed.
Subscribers began declining.
Interest faded.
Eventually, it reached a point where continuing the subscription model no longer made practical sense, and I had to stop offering it altogether.
For a long time, I believed one major reason was that very few people truly understood the depth of work involved in creating meaningful ratings. Deriving accurate figures required years of study, race-watching, record keeping, and practical experience.
It was a niche skill.
Then came AI.
And everything changed even faster.
Today, with a simple prompt, people can generate ratings that once required years of domain knowledge. Speed figures, performance comparisons, and analytical summaries can now be created in seconds.
What’s even more fascinating—and perhaps unsettling—is that AI is increasingly capable of handicapping races at a level that can rival, and sometimes even outperform, seasoned handicappers who spent 20–30 years mastering their craft.
That raises an important question.
Where does that leave traditional handicappers?
Does experience still matter?
Do punters still value the intuition, race-reading ability, and nuanced judgment that comes from decades of watching horses, trainers, jockey patterns, track conditions, and understanding things that numbers alone may miss?
Or has the game permanently changed?
Have punters moved on from relying on experienced analysts because AI can now provide endless data instantly?
I’m genuinely curious to know what today’s punters think.
Would you still be interested in the old-school style of race analysis done by experienced handicappers?
Do you still value curated selections and human insight?
Or has that chapter closed forever?
Has the bird already flown away?
And perhaps that realization changes how one looks at things.
At this stage of life, money is no longer the driving factor.
What matters more is spending whatever productive time I have left doing something that once gave me immense joy—studying races, analyzing form, creating ratings, and sharing that work with fellow punters who genuinely value it.
Horse racing handicapping has been more than just a hobby for me—it has been a passion, an obsession, and in many ways, a defining part of my life.
Before I fade into complete irrelevance, I would like to give it one final meaningful attempt—not as a business venture, but as a return to something I truly loved doing.
The only question is:
Are there still punters who value that kind of old-school, experience-driven work?
Or has the world moved on completely?
I would genuinely appreciate your honest thoughts.
Future course of action would depend on the response to this post Vinodvyass76@gmail.com
Cardiovascular fitness drops fairly quickly. In racehorses:
Aerobic capacity decreases noticeably within 2–4 weeks.
Muscle mass starts to atrophy after ~4–6 weeks without intense exercise.
A 3-month break can lead to:
Loss of speed, stamina, and agility.
Need for reconditioning before racing again.
Reconditioning a horse safely after 3 months can take 6–8 weeks.
Joints, tendons, and ligaments adapt to regular high-intensity stress:
Sudden return to racing after 3 months can increase the risk of injury, especially soft tissue injuries.
Bones may lose some mechanical strength if not exercised under load.
Thoroughbreds thrive on routine:
A long break can lead to boredom or behavioral issues, such as cribbing or stall vices.
Some horses become harder to handle at the start of training again.
Horses also “forget” racing cues, meaning they may need time to regain race-day focus.
Horses may gain weight if not exercised properly, or conversely, lose condition if feed isn’t adjusted.
After 3 months off, trainers often need to carefully balance diet and exercise to restore optimal racing weight.
Studies and trainer experience show:
Horses returning after 3 months off may initially run slower or tire faster.
Some come back at peak level, but only after gradual training and a couple of preparatory races.
For top-tier racing, a 3-month interruption is significant and could affect earnings, form, and rankings.
Missed prize money.
Training costs continue, even if the horse is not racing.
Potential devaluation if the horse’s form suffers after a long layoff.
A 3-month racing freeze is manageable, but horses need careful fitness and mental conditioning to return safely.
The first few races back are usually considered “tune-up” races rather than peak performance races.