Bangalore 01.05

 

No response is also a response!!

BTC and professionals have adopted a cautious approach evident by low class races and small cards. 

Race-1: ZAYYARA (2)

This is a lowest possible grade race. Class-5 horses lack closing finish and old form also does not hold good hence preference should be for Horses dropping in class or having good recent Speed and Time form ratings or fitter horses. For sprint races in Bangalore outer drawn horses have little chance hence ignoring them. TYAARA, an average bred filly has to carry top weight. ZAYYARA finished a close 3rd in debut, best suited for 1200mts. MYSTICAL QUEEN has best speed numbers but drawn wide. EMBOSOM though long in tooth has credentials to finish in place. 

Post Race Notes: Result: 2-8-10 

ayyara(80/100) as expected stalked the pace behind front runner Mystical Queen, drifted but in the end won well. Embosom, our choice for place was quietly backed from 4/1 to 2/1, stayed in the 3rd position till end. Tayarra went negative in odds and was never in hunt any stage of the race

Race-2: STALINGRAD (5)

This is a 1300mts race which is neither a pure sprint nor a Route trip. Preference should be given to well-weighted leaders/stalkers with good speed numbers, inner drawn horses will have a better chance. IMPERADOR is a well-bred class-3 prospect gelding but reappears without any preparation. ADORNMENT had an excellent chance in this sprint but drawn wide, if unable to sit in a pace stalking position her chances get diminished fast. VIBRANT QUEEN tried a sprint tactics at Mysore but failed, has limited burst of speed. STALINGRAD looks to be in great shape as evident by pleasing trials and should be strongly involved. QUEENDOM has won a mock race recently, makes handicap debut at decent mark, since both runs of career were poor treating this run as a WATCH run.

Post Race Notes: Result: 6-8-3

Open odds race, 6.Frederika surprisingly  and 8.Queendom were joint favs @3/1. Stalingrad and Vibrant Queen remained friend less in market at 7/1. Adornment @9/1 was led to the gates without Jockey {a strong negative trait making horse complacent} 

As gates opened on expectedly lines 3 and 8 led followed by 1. Pace collapsed in last 300mts and Fedrika , a debutant zoomed past front runners and won very easily. Queendom and Vibrant queen stayed in second and 3rd position. Our selection Stalingrad  went negative in odds from 3.5 to 8/1 and was always in rear 

Race-3: ZEPHYRINE(2)

Class 5 sprint race. Preference should be for fitter horses with sprinting or pace stalking abilities drawn in inner draws. Class Droppers having decent Speed and Time form ratings should be the top pick. WINDCLEAVER, a decent bred is never shown in morning trials, Whip-less Jockey and lack of initial speed dents his chances further. ZEPHYRINE with couple of runs under her belt is the most matured among her co-age contestants, she has the ability to be with pace. AGRIMA is clearly a 1400mts horse, has won a mock race on 18th April but not active in trials thereafter, horse lacks initial speed, Jockey Trevor has tough task to place this horse with pace from the wide draw.

Post Race Notes: Result:2-6-1

2.Zephyrine at 90/100 and 3.Agrima @ 2.75 were first two favs and others at longer odds. No appreciable change noted in win and place odds till end. Hno 3 bolted while loading and ran full course and was withdrawn, also 10 was scratched.

As the gates opened fav sat in second position behind Infinity spirit., Zephyrine extended well to win easlly, Royal Jewel stayed on well from inside to finish 2nd pipping Windcleaver .Ladyness was slow in start

Race-4: THRILL OF BRAZIL (1)

This is a class-4 race over 1400mts {Extended Sprint}. Compulsive front runners or plodders, horses with no speed drawn in wider draws, horses with inconsistent Speed/Time Form rating can be ignored. THRILL OF BRAZIL repeats in same C&D working very well, despite wide draw can easily stay with pace and should be able to handle a lenient penalty. EL ALAMEIN performs well in Summer, attained competitive mark, place looks good. GANDOLFINI is a lethargic type. SHE RULES lost at gates in last run, recent trackwork pattern reveals she still remains slow start suspect. 

Post Race Notes: Result: 3-1-10

Thrill of Brazil opened at 1.75, Bellavita(3) who changed stables second time in a short career was joint fav @2/1,eased off to 2.75 by the end. She Rules was available between 7-8..

11&4 led early followed by 1.Pace collapsed and 1 shot ahead but 3 came with telling strides to beat 1 and won easily. She Rules like mentioned in the pre race analysis was again slowly away by 5 lengths but in the end came up flying to finish 3rd.

Race-5: BUREVESTNICK(1)

This is a sprint race for 3yrs old maiden horses, only 3 in the field of 9 horses have race experience. We need to focus on horses with speed oriented pedigree and trials. Trainers intent also matters in this type of races. BUREVESTNICK showed the ability to sprint in debut run, eye catching recent trials and top Jockey booking make this colt the top pick. LEGACY FIELD has impressed in gates and fast works, ideally needs 1200mts but can end up close to the winner. COUNTRY'S MCQUEEN has stamina leaning pedigree. DEEP RESPECT, the only ride of the top Jockey has strong stamina influence. PORTIEUX does not appeal on the preparation model. 

Post Race Notes: Result: 7-2-1

1 was strongly fancied and others above 8/1

Deep Respect ridden by Suraj denied fav the lead and stayed in front all the way causing an upset. legacy Field came flying in the end to finish a good second 

Race-6: EAGLE EYES (2)

This is a Class-3 1400mts race. We need to focus on horses weighted between 55-58kgs that have finished consistently in Top-3 of  this class. Pure Sprinters, Plodders, horses with no speed drawn in outer draws should be ignored. EAGLE EYES earned an excellent Time form Rating for impressive win in last run, outer draw may not be an issue as colt can stay close to pace, top pick.  TOLKEIN was fancied for a place spot in Malakpet Derby, well-prepared and should be in contention. WINFIELD performs well in Summer, placed first time over this C&D. MOON STAR won well at start of last Summer season but has been struggling since then.

Post Race Notes: Result: 3-5-2 

Eagle Eyes attracted maximum betting followed by Tolkein

Tolkein made every post a winning one while Eagle Eyes went all out but could not overtake front running Tolkein and D Frox

Race-7: HAZEL(2)

If Stalingrad {R2-5} wins then by Division theory all horses except for bottom 2 horses qualify. ZILFEE from Mysore is an average bred, top weight will have its toll. HAZEL, a speedy filly will shoot like a rocket from innermost draw, will be hard to catch. ROCKING STAR, winner of last start has appeared in a mock race but not given any fast work thereafter. LARISSA is blazing tracks, failed fav in last run over mile and this drop in distance suits but need to be up with pace. 

Post Race Notes: Result: 2-8-7 

Hazel and Larissa were joint favs @14/10 approx

As expected Hazel led all the way, Larissa tried hard but could not. Auctac came threateningly from inside to almost land a huge upset 

DAYS BEST: EAGLE EYES [6-2]

NEXT BEST: THRILL OF BRAZIL [4-1]

PLACE ACCUMULATOR: 4-2/5-2/6-3

Has the bird flown away ??

I started Deccan Selections back in 2008

At the time, it was simply an attempt to share my race selections—primarily for Hyderabad races—with fellow punters who were looking for genuine insights rather than random tips. What began as a small effort quickly gained momentum.

And what a journey it was.

The strike rate of my selections in the early years was exceptionally good. Word spread quickly among racing enthusiasts, and soon Deccan Selections became a widely followed blog in racing circles. Page views regularly crossed impressive numbers, and on some race days, traffic would shoot past 20,000 views in a single day.

For someone doing this purely out of passion, that kind of response was deeply satisfying.

Encouraged by the success, I expanded beyond Hyderabad and began covering other racing centers as well. The results remained encouraging, and over time I developed a far more structured approach to handicapping.

This eventually led me to create something I was extremely proud of — a Worksheet, a comprehensive data sheet that covered nearly every important handicapping factor:

• Speed Ratings
• Timeform Ratings
• Merit Ratings
• Comparative performance metrics
• Other critical race indicators used by serious handicappers

At that point, I made a decision that many content creators eventually consider—I moved from free content to a paid subscription model.

Initially, the response was decent. Quite a few subscribers signed up because they recognized the amount of effort and expertise involved in producing quality race analysis.

But slowly, things changed.

Subscribers began declining.

Interest faded.

Eventually, it reached a point where continuing the subscription model no longer made practical sense, and I had to stop offering it altogether.

For a long time, I believed one major reason was that very few people truly understood the depth of work involved in creating meaningful ratings. Deriving accurate figures required years of study, race-watching, record keeping, and practical experience.

It was a niche skill.

Then came AI.

And everything changed even faster.

Today, with a simple prompt, people can generate ratings that once required years of domain knowledge. Speed figures, performance comparisons, and analytical summaries can now be created in seconds.

What’s even more fascinating—and perhaps unsettling—is that AI is increasingly capable of handicapping races at a level that can rival, and sometimes even outperform, seasoned handicappers who spent 20–30 years mastering their craft.

That raises an important question.

Where does that leave traditional handicappers?

Does experience still matter?

Do punters still value the intuition, race-reading ability, and nuanced judgment that comes from decades of watching horses, trainers, jockey patterns, track conditions, and understanding things that numbers alone may miss?

Or has the game permanently changed?

Have punters moved on from relying on experienced analysts because AI can now provide endless data instantly?

I’m genuinely curious to know what today’s punters think.

Would you still be interested in the old-school style of race analysis done by experienced handicappers?

Do you still value curated selections and human insight?

Or has that chapter closed forever?

Has the bird already flown away?

I’d love to hear honest opinions from fellow punters and racing enthusiasts.
There’s also a personal reason behind why I’m asking this question now.
Over the past few years, I’ve been dealing with a chronic illness that has gradually limited both my energy and the amount of time I can devote to serious handicapping work. Realistically speaking, I may not have an unlimited window ahead before I become completely ineffective in doing the kind of detailed work I once loved.

And perhaps that realization changes how one looks at things.

At this stage of life, money is no longer the driving factor.

What matters more is spending whatever productive time I have left doing something that once gave me immense joy—studying races, analyzing form, creating ratings, and sharing that work with fellow punters who genuinely value it.

Horse racing handicapping has been more than just a hobby for me—it has been a passion, an obsession, and in many ways, a defining part of my life.

Before I fade into complete irrelevance, I would like to give it one final meaningful attempt—not  as a business venture, but as a return to something I truly loved doing.

The only question is:

Are there still punters who value that kind of old-school, experience-driven work?

Or has the world moved on completely?

I would genuinely appreciate your honest thoughts. 

Future course of action would depend on the response to this post Vinodvyass76@gmail.com